Technological Hazard >>  Radiation hazard >> Frequently Asked Questions

 

 

1.    What is Radiological accident?

2.   What types of Radiological accident are there?

3.     Why does Radiological accident occur?

4.     Where does Radiological accident  occur?

5.    What could be consequences of Radiological accident?

6.    Can the causes of Radiological accident  be influenced by human behavior?

7.    Can the consequences of Radiological accident be influenced by human behavior?

8.  Can Radiological accident be predicted?

9.    Is there any way to prevent Radiological accident?

10. Is there any way to mitigate Radiological accident consequences?

11. What to do in case of Radiological accident?

12. What types of maps on Radiological accident  exists?

 

What is Radiological Accident?

 

Humans are primarily exposed to natural radiation from the sun, cosmic rays, and naturally occurring radioactive elements found in the rocks, food, and environment.  Radon, which emanates from the ground, is another important source of natural radiation. Cosmic rays from space include energetic protons, electrons, gamma rays, and x rays. The primary radioactive elements found in the earth's crust are uranium, thorium, and potassium, and their radioactive derivatives. These elements emit alpha and beta particles, or gamma rays.

The average doses of population exposure due to all nuclear industry and man-made radioactive sources is about 1% from doses due to natural radiation, but it is not the case of nuclear or radiological accident. Nuclear or Radiological Accident – generally refers to events involving the release of significant levels of radioactivity and exposure of workers or the general public to radiation.

 

What types of Radiological Accident are there?  

A Nuclear Accident is one involving a device that uses a controlled chain reaction for some purpose.  For example, a Nuclear Power Plant has nuclear fuel that through a self-sustaining and controlled chain reaction produces heat, turns turbines and produces electricity.  Because of the energy involved in this process, there is potential for considerable radioactive material to be released and dispersed into the environment.  Such a release would be due to a ‘nuclear accident’. Normally nuclear accidents with releases to the environment are very rare.  However they have the potential to lead to widespread dispersion of radioactive material. 

Radiological accidents are initiating by the lost radiation sources, accidents during transportation of radioactive sources or materials, equipment or human errors in radiation sources operation.

Sources, often called "sealed sources," are usually small metal containers in which a small amount of a radioactive material is sealed.

 

Why does Radiological Accident occur?  

The nuclear (power, military or research) reactors are the main sources of radiation. The radioactivity of nuclear reactor core in millions times higher, than any other man-made sources of radiation. Although construction and operation of nuclear power plants are closely monitored and regulated, an accident, though unlikely, is possible. The potential danger from an accident at a nuclear reactor is exposure to radiation. This exposure could come from the release of radioactive material from the plant into the environment, usually characterized by a plume (cloud-like) formation. The size of the area affected is determined by the amount of radioactive material released from the plant, wind direction and speed, and weather conditions (i.e., rain, snow, etc.), which would quickly drive the radioactive material to the ground, causing increased deposition of radionuclides. Significant contamination could affect areas up to 30 kilometers from the accident site.

Radiological accidents can occur wherever radioactive materials are used, stored, or transported. In addition to nuclear power plants, hospitals, universities, research laboratories, industries, major highways, railroads, and shipping yards could be the site of a radiological accident. The radioactive sources are frequently used in industrial gauges (e.g., moisture and density gauges). If these gauges or other radiation-containing equipment is disposed of improperly or sent for recycling as scrap metal, the sealed source may be 'lost' and end up in a metal recycling facility or in the possession of someone who is not licensed to handle the source. They are one of the most frequently reported radioactive contaminants in shipments received by scrap metal facilities. If a steel mill melts a source, it contaminates the entire batch of metal, the processing equipment, and the facility. More importantly, it can result in the exposure of workers or users to radiation.

There have also been incidents in which unsuspecting people find these sources, and not knowing what they are, keep them or even open them and suffer serious exposures. Some satellites use radioactive materials as a power source during long space flights. During the launch or re-entry of satellites there is the potential for an accident that would disperse radioactive materials.

 

  Where does Radiological Accident occur?  

Radiation is used in medicine, military, and industry. Main users of man-made radiation include: medical facilities such as hospitals and pharmaceutical facilities; research and teaching institutions; nuclear reactors and their supporting facilities such as uranium mills and fuel preparation plants; and facilities involved in nuclear weapons production as part of their normal operation. More then 400 Nuclear Power Reactors are in operation around the World (see http://www.wano.org.uk/WANO_Documents/WANO_Map/WANO_Map.pdf).

On 26 April 1986, the most serious accident in the history of the nuclear industry occurred at Unit 4 of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in the former Ukrainian Republic of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, near the common borders of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine.

Major releases of radionuclides from the Chernobyl reactor continued for ten days following the explosion on April 26. These included radioactive gases, condensed aerosols and fuel particles. The total release of radioactive material was about 14 Ebq.

More than 200,000 square kilometers of Europe was contaminated with levels of 137Cs above 37 kBq/m2. Much of this area was within the three most affected countries, Belarus, Russia and Ukraine.

See more http://www.tesec-int.org/Chernobyl.htm

The worst commercial accident in the United States occurred at the Three Mile Island nuclear station in 1979. As a result of equipment failures and operator error, a valve that was stuck open allowed coolant water that covered the reactor core to escape from the reactor system for over two hours. This radioactive water, nearly a million gallons, ended up on the basement floors of the containment building and auxiliary buildings. The loss of coolant water in the reactor core continued to the point that the fuel was no longer submerged in water. Without the cooling provided by the water, the cladding and some of the fuel pellets melted. Large quantities of radioactive material were released into the containment building.

Radiological accidents are initiating by the lost radiation sources, accidents during transportation of radioactive sources or materials, equipment or human errors in radiation sources operation. One of the most severe radiological accident take place September 1987, Goiania, Brazil. A radiotherapy unit had been abandoned in a clinic, which was being demolished. The unit had a source consisted of 1375 curies of cesium-137, sealed within two nested stainless steel containers to form a 5-cm diameter capsule. Two individuals dismantled the unit and extracted the source, taking it to the home and opened. On 21 September the source material was removed and distributed among several people, some of whom spread it on their skin. About 112,800 people were examined of whom 129 were found to be contaminated, 9 people died.

 

What could be consequences of Radiological Accident?  

The main negative consequences of nuclear or radiological accidents are following:

·               Consequences for health: deterministic effects and stochastic effects

·               Psychological

·               Environmental

·               Economic

·               Social

Consequences for health. There are basically two types of physical health effect related to radiation exposure.  The first is called a deterministic effect.  These effects occur relatively soon (within days to weeks) after an exposure to a high dose at a high dose rate.  Essentially the damage to the tissue from the radiation is so extensive that the body does not have time to regenerate new tissue, and so the effect becomes visible with many of the features of a thermal burn, but usually much deeper and long-lasting.

The second type of health effect that can be caused by radiation is a so-called stochastic effect, such as cancer or hereditary effects in any future offspring.  These types of effects are characterised by their  late appearance after exposure (several years up to decades), and critically that their occurrence is not certain.  The radiation may cause some damage to the cells of the body which is not visible but changes the functioning of those cells.  These changes may manifest themselves at a much later date as a cancer for example.  Notice that we say ‘may’ occur, there is no certainty of occurrence.   For stochastic effects, we find that the chance or probability of an effect increases the higher the radiation dose.  So at low doses there is a very low chance of cancer developing - at very high doses, there is a higher chance of cancer.  However it appears that there is no ‘safe’ dose, or dose threshold below which cancers do not occur.  Also it appears that it is the cumulative dose that influences the chance of cancer development and not the dose rate (at least not strongly).

Nuclear and radiological accidents have also consequences other than just the direct physical effects on humans.  Psychological health effects will always accompany a nuclear or radiological accident whether or not it has resulted in persons receiving significant radiation exposure.  Some protective actions taken during Chernobyl to reduce the radiological health risks, such as relocation and resettlement, did more harm than good because of the resulting psychological health effects brought on by stress and anxiety.

When land, water or air becomes contaminated with radioactive material, there is concern about the environmental effects.  Normally radiation does not affect the ecosystem unless the levels are very high, although it can damage individual plants and animals.  More problematic are the impact of countermeasures on the environment - countermeasures that were taken to protect man.  Moreover when the environment becomes contaminated with radioactive material no matter whether the levels are very small, there is concern among the population continuing to live there.  Finally environmental processes, such as wind and rivers can transport radioactive material from one place to another, which raises further concerns.

Any countermeasures taken to address health or environmental impact will have associated costs, whether they will be the direct cost of the countermeasure itself, or the lost economic output from formally productive areas.  Together with health and environmental impact the social consequences associated with the accident and any countermeasures employed, it is clear that the consequences are often more than just the direct health consequences alone.

 

 Can the causes of Radiological Accident be influenced by human behavior?

  All practical efforts must be made to prevent and mitigate nuclear or radiological accidents.  The most harmful consequences arising from facilities and activities have come from the loss of control over a nuclear reactor core, nuclear chain reaction, radioactive source or other source of radiation. Consequently, to ensure that the likelihood of an accident having harmful consequences is extremely low, measures have to be taken:

·  To prevent the occurrence of failures or abnormal conditions (including breaches of security) that could lead to such a loss of control;

·  To prevent the escalation of any such failures or abnormal conditions that do occur;

·  To prevent the loss of, or the loss of control over, a radioactive source or other source of radiation.

 Can the consequences of Radiological Accident be influenced by human behavior?

The preparedness, response and relief  are the tools for minimizing of the Radiological Accident consequences.

The primary goals of preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiological emergency are:

·  To ensure that, for reasonably foreseeable incidents, radiation risks would be minor;

·  For any incidents that do occur, to take practical measures to mitigate any consequences for human life and health and the environment.

The licensee, the employer, the regulatory body and appropriate branches of government have to establish, in advance, arrangements for preparedness and response for a nuclear or radiation emergency at the scene, at local, regional and national levels and, where so agreed between States, at the international level.

Relief is usually a gradual process. Safety is a primary issue, as are mental and physical well-being.

Many lessons have been learned from Chernobyl experience in the field of post-crisis administration and rehabilitation. Social-economical recovery is the most significant problem of regions affected by the Chernobyl catastrophe. Lack of reliable information led to mistrust of authorities generally and, in particular, in official statements on radiation levels. This greatly hindered effective communication with the public, and the recovery process itself. Successful minimization of Chernobyl accident consequences is being possible only with adequate integrated scientific maintenance of all accomplished works. The role of trustful information remains important for territory rehabilitation and providing protection of the population from radiation.

Evacuation and resettlement of more than a hundred thousand people caused psychological stress, however this was justified on the grounds of radiation safety. Later resettlement of people from low contaminated areas was unjustified. This experience has implications for responding to any future accident, nuclear or otherwise.

Anxiety about health consequences of radiation exposure has not abated over time. In affected areas some inhabitants are in a state of helplessness, passivity and are unable to make decisions about their future. Innovative approaches are needed to involve affected populations on measures to improve their living conditions on the contaminated territories There is a need to present information to certain groups of persons, who can use it and give helpful advice to the affected population, using an integrated approach to healthy lifestyle, not only about radiation dangers.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Can Radiological Accident be predicted?

Ionizing radiation affects people by depositing energy in body tissue, which can cause cell damage or cell death. In some cases there may be no effect. In other cases, the cell may survive but become abnormal, either temporarily or permanently, or an abnormal cell may become malignant. Large doses of radiation can cause extensive cellular damage and result in death. With smaller doses, the person or particular irradiated organ(s) may survive, but the cells are damaged, increasing the chance of cancer. The extent of the damage depends upon the total amount of energy absorbed, the time period and dose rate of exposure, and the particular organ(s) exposed.

 Evidence of injury from low or moderate doses of radiation may not show up for months or even years. For leukemia, the minimum time period between the radiation exposure and the appearance of disease (latency period) is 2 years. For solid tumors, the latency period is more than 5 years. The types of effects and their probability of occurrence can depend on whether the exposure occurs over a large part of a person's lifespan (chronic) or during a very short portion of the lifespan (acute). 

Ionizing radiation is a source of risk for human, but we have to use it for the benefit of community. 

Is there any way to prevent Radiological Accident?

The primary means of accident preventing is ‘defence in depth’. Defence in depth is implemented primarily through the combination of a number of consecutive and independent levels of protection that would have to fail before harmful effects could be caused to people or to the environment. If one level of protection or barrier were to fail, the subsequent level or barrier would be available. When properly implemented, defence in depth ensures that no single technical, human or organizational failure could lead to harmful effects, and that the combinations of failures that could give rise to significant harmful effects are of very low probability. The independent effectiveness of the different levels of defence is a necessary element of defence in depth.

Defence in depth is provided by an appropriate combination of:

·  An effective management system with a strong management commitment to safety and a strong safety culture.

·  Adequate site selection and the incorporation of good design and engineering features providing safety margins, diversity and redundancy, mainly by the use of:

-        Design, technology and materials of high quality and reliability;

-        Control, limiting and protection systems and surveillance features;

-        An appropriate combination of inherent and engineered safety features.

-        Comprehensive operational procedures and practices as well as accident management procedures.

 Is there any way to mitigate Radiological Accident consequences?

Mitigation is the measures undertaken to limit the adverse impact of Radiological Accident. It based on two main components:

  •  On-site and off-site emergency planning

  •  Community awareness

 

 The practical goals, following on-site and off-site emergency planning, are:

1) to regain control of the situation;

2) prevent or mitigate consequences at the scene;

3) to prevent the occurrence of deterministic health effects in workers and the public;

4) to render first aid and manage the treatment of radiation injuries;

5) to prevent, to the extent practicable, the occurrence of stochastic health effects in the

population;

6) to prevent, to the extent practicable, the occurrence of adverse non-radiological effects on individuals and among the population;

7) to protect, to the extent practicable, the environment and property; and

8) to prepare, to the extent practicable, for the resumption of normal social and economic activity.

What to do in case of Radiological Accident?

The strategy to reduce public risk in the case of most severe, reactor core damage accident is:

Before or shortly after release - based on plant conditions

·  Evacuate or substantial shelter within 3 - 5 km

·  Take thyroid blocking near the plant

After a release

·  Prompt monitoring to locate areas requiring further protective actions.

·  Restrict consumption of locally grown food up to 300 km., following to monitoring results

·  Monitoring to locate where food restrictions and relocation are warranted

 There are three general guidelines for controlling exposure to ionizing radiation:

·  minimizing exposure time,

·  maximizing distance from the radiation source,

·  shielding yourself from the radiation source.

Time is an important factor in limiting exposure to the public and to radiological emergency responders. The shorter the period of time an individual stays in a radiation field, the smaller the dose a person will receive. The maximum time to be spent in the radiation environment is defined as the stay time. The stay time can be calculated using the following equation:

 Stay Time = Exposure Limit/Dose Rate.

 

What types of maps on Radiological Accident exist?

The emergency plans for facilities with highest radiological risk (like nuclear power reactors) defining two types of emergency planning areas:

ON-SITE AREA

This is the area surrounding the facility within the security perimeter, fence or other

designated property marker. It can also be the controlled area around a radiography source or contaminated area. It is the area under the immediate control of the facility or operator. For transport emergencies or emergencies involving uncontrolled sources or localized contamination there may not be an on-site area defined at the onset of the emergency.

OFF-SITE AREA

This is the area beyond that under the control of the facility operator or first responders. For facilities with the potential for emergencies resulting in major off-site releases or exposures, the level of planning will vary depending on the distance from the facility. For these facilities, planning three emergency planning zones:

Precautionary action zone (PAZ)

This is a predesignated area around a facility, where urgent protective action has been preplanned and will be implemented immediately upon declaration of a general emergency. The goal is to substantially reduce the risk of severe deterministic health effects by taking protective action within this zone before or shortly after a release.

Urgent protective action planning zone (UPZ)

This is a predesignated area around a facility  where preparations are made to promptly implement urgent protective action based on environmental monitoring data and assessment of facility conditions, the goal being to avert doses specified in international standards.

Food restriction planning radius (FRR)

This is the area where preparations for effective implementation of protective actions to reduce the risk of stochastic health effects from the ingestion of locally grown food should be developed in advance. In general, protective actions such as relocation, food restrictions and agricultural countermeasures will be based on environmental monitoring and food sampling.

These zones should be roughly circular areas around the facility, their boundaries defined by local landmarks (e.g. roads or rivers) to allow easy identification during a response . It is important to note that the zones do not stop at national borders. The size of the zones can be determined by an analysis of the potential consequences. Previous studies also provide a basis for generic zone sizes for nuclear power reactor:

 PAZ 3- 5 km ., UPZ   25 km ., FRR 300 km . (METHOD FOR DEVELOPING ARRANGEMENTS FOR RESPONSE TO A NUCLEAR OR RADIOLOGICAL EMERGENCY IAEA, VIENNA, 2003 EPR-METHOD (2003) ISBN 92–0–111503–2)